Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 05 Nov 2007

Geologic Time: A Semiotic Probing

and
Page Range: 116 – 122
DOI: 10.17704/eshi.8.2.9w10334423243554
Save
Download PDF

Time is a continuum and is real, according to Peircean theory. It is also the constitutive category of geology that is equivalent to the Peircean category of Thirdness. As a continuum, time was created and evolved. Although the conceptions of a linear and a cyclic time played a role in the development of geological science, they were not deduced from geological observations; they were a priori assumptions. Hence, time is a methodological device. Continuity, for Peirce, exists on evolutionary terms. Chance or Firstness is always present in every phenomenon. So, time is continual rather then continuous, a continuum where new possibilities of development can be added, by the action of Chance or Firstness. The notion of cycle in geologic time should be reviewed. For Peirce real time is multiply- or n-tracked. Real time is open to firstness. According to this, geologic time is the vestige, a great vestige, of the fixed and definite track which, within the n-possibilities of development, the planet evolved, incorporating changes produced by chance.

Albritton, C.C.Jr., 1980. The abyss of time. San Francisco, Freeman Cooper Co., 251 p.

Bubnoff, S. von, 1963. Fundamentals of Geology, transl. from Grundprobleme der Geologie, 1954, by HARRY, W.T., Oliver and Boyd Ed., Edimburgh, 299 p.

Campbell, J., 1986. The Masks of God, vol. 2, Dallas, Pen. Penguin Books, 561 p.

Helm, B.P., 1982, The Nature and Modes of Time, p. 178-188. in Smith, J.E. (ed.), The Relevance of Charles Peirce, The Monist Library of Philosophy, U.S.A.

Ito, Y., 1988. Hooke's cyclic theory of the Earth in the context of Seventeenth Century England. The British Journal for the History of Science, 21(70):295-314, part 3.

Ivanov, V.V., 1976. 0 Papel das oposicoes binarias na abordagem mitopoetica do tempo, p. 221-223. in Schnaidermann, B. (org). Semiotica Russa, Ed. Perspectiva, Sao Paulo.

Krauskopf, K., 1968. A tale of ten plutons. Geol. Soc. of Amer. Bull, 79: 1-17.

Kevelson, R., 1983. Time as method in C. S. Peirce. Amer. Jour, of Semiotics, II(2): 85-107.

Kitts, D., 1977. The structure of geology. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas.

Leonov, G.P., 1962. The problem of cycles in geological history. Inter. Geol. Rev., 16(12): 2093-2099, Washington.

O'Rourke, J.E., 1978. A comparison of James Hutton's "Principles of Knowledge" and "Theory of the Earth". ISIS, 69 (246:5-20)

Paschoale, C. 1989. Geologia como semiotica da natureza. MSc. thesis, São Paulo, PUC/SP, 138 p.

Peirce, C.S., 1935 - 1958, Collected Papers, 8 vol., Cambridge Press: Harvard Univ. Press.

Potapova, M.S., 1968. Geology as an historical science of nature, p. 117-126. in Baranov, V.I. et alli (ed). Interactions of the sciences in the study of the earth. Progress Publ., Moscow.

Ransdell, J., 1976. On the origin, aim, and application of Peirce's semiotic. Proceedings of the Semiotic Society of America, vol. 5, p. 32-49.

Rossi, P., 1979. I segni del tempo, Feltrinelli, Milano.

  • Download PDF